The News & Observer wrote that N.C. state Sen. Tony Rand proposed a law that would require North Carolina college students to perform specific community service in order to get their diplomas.

The proposed legislation is Senate Bill 2079, the “Eve Carson/Abhijit Mahato Community Service Program,” and states, “students shall provide mentoring and tutoring services for a minimum of 20 hours per semester to public school-aged children across the state.”

Sen. Rand proposes to “honor” two slain students by requiring — in other words, forcing — every other student in the state to perform community service in their names. Not only that, the law would require them to perform service for which they may or may not have any aptitude or desire: the program gives them no choice in the manner or method of their service, but would force them to work with public school children.

Clearly Mr. Rand’s good intentions have run amok. It’s one thing to encourage students to serve others at a time and place of their own choosing, but to force them into a particular type of community servitude in order to appease the legislature’s sense of what they should be doing?

Furthermore, Rand’s proposal goes beyond students in state schools to include every undergraduate; the N&O noted that “The state’s private colleges and universities would have to impose the same requirement if they wanted to continue participating in two financial aid programs that the state provides to North Carolinians attending those schools.” (Note that the students receiving the aid are not mentioned, but the schools: therefore, students receiving no aid from the state whatsoever would be subject to the same requirement.) As I wrote on my blog, this is a bad idea and should be shouted down from the rooftops of every dormitory to the floor of the legislature.

Not because community service is bad, but because lawmakers should not be trying to legislate it. If a college decides to require community service as a graduation requirement, students have the choice to go to another college if they don’t want to meet the requirement. If the state requires community service, students won’t have that same choice.

And since this proposed law mandates — requires — what would normally be acts of charity, what other ramifications does that present?

First, it means that the community service is no longer voluntary, but compulsory. That may seem a small distinction, but what other compulsory service might the legislature mandate? Would our leaders require community service of all of us, and specify what it must be?

Second, it means that those who don’t participate are by definition lawbreakers — and that the state would punish them by withholding the degrees they’ve otherwise earned.

Third, it treats students as pools of free labor available to meet whatever pressing or passing need strikes the legislative fancy, when their primary purpose should be concentrating on their studies and learning the skills that will carry them with confidence into the future.

Good intentions, remember, pave the road to hell. And politicians are full of good intentions.